Colby is a Senior Municipal Strategist with more than 30 years of fixed income experience, responsible for Market Vectors municipal bond investments.
Van Eck Global, as the sponsor of Market Vectors municipal bond exchange-traded funds (ETFs), naturally has serious concerns following the filing of the petition by the City of Detroit seeking protection under Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code. What implications do I think are to be drawn? I believe it does mean an immediate adjustment to the valuations of securities issued by the City of Detroit and its instrumentalities. The potential diminution of those values may have an impact upon some investors’ personal as well as large institutional portfolios, to varying degrees. Market Vectors’ municipal bond ETFs seek to track indices constructed with a rigorous rules-based structure. The City of Detroit and some of its instrumentalities are, because of their prior creditworthiness and presence as large issuers of municipal bonds, included in these indices and, hence, are present in several of the ETFs (HYD, MLN, ITM and SMB). The following table displays exposure of Market Vectors municipal bond ETFs to City of Detroit municipal bonds versus each ETF’s underlying index. As of yesterday (July 18), prior to the Chapter 9 filing, these issues were appropriate holdings, in my view. If the ratings agencies were to adjust the credit ratings of these issuers, many holdings may no longer be eligible for inclusion in the ETFs’ underlying indices. Such is the rules-based approach of index funds and, in particular, of ETFs. If removed from the index, and as the market allows, those securities may be removed from the ETFs.
City of Detroit Municipal Bond Exposure (% of Portfolio)
As of June 30, 2013
Source: Van Eck Global. 1Indices are as follows, HYD: Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index; MLN: Barclays AMT-Free Long Continuous Municipal Index; ITM: Barclays AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous Municipal Index; SMB: Barclays AMT-Free Short Continuous Municipal Index. See below for index descriptions.
To be clear, I believe filing for bankruptcy by a municipality is not an end. Nor do I believe it necessarily means mass firings, closing of offices and shuttering of municipal services (e.g., police, fire, water, sewer and electric). It does mean, in my view, that there may now be a process, overseen and directed by a judge, to stop the clock on expenses to seek to redress the massive imbalance of revenues and obligations. I feel that Detroit may continue to function day-to-day as a going concern, relieved temporarily from some of the burden of payments. Assuming the bankruptcy court accepts and approves the Chapter 9 filing, I would expect the court to begin directing payments as needed. [NOTE: The outcome of the bankruptcy and legal proceedings are uncertain and there is no guarantee of payment.]The critical element underpinning this event, in my view, also fundamentally sets the foundation for the majority of all financings done in the municipal bond market. That is, of a "moral obligation" on the part of the issuer of bonds to promise to set the "full faith and credit" and taxing power of that entity ahead of other debts in order to repay the owners of those bonds. The state-appointed emergency manager of the City of Detroit has already made representations that he, and the State, may be willing to break that foundation in its effort to save Detroit and put it back on the path to financial solvency. What is of concern to me here, and has been voiced by analysts and portfolio managers alike, is that the path chosen for Detroit may likely set a precedent for other struggling cities and communities that undermines the totality of municipal finance. Should that occur, I believe there would be damage done to untold numbers of portfolios as confidence may disappear and valuations may potentially drop.
I believe the process, to be sure, will not please everyone and pain will likely be borne. But I urge caution with regards to any precedent-breaking measures that leave a nearly $3.7 trillion municipal bond industry looking worse than Detroit in its darkest day.
Barclays Municipal Custom High Yield Composite Index is calculated using a market value weighting methodology and it tracks the high-yield municipal bond market with a 75% weight in non investment-grade municipal bonds and a 25% weight in Baa/BBB-rated investment-grade municipal bonds for liquidity and balance. Barclays AMT-Free Long Continuous Municipal Index is a market value weighted index designed to replicate the price movements of long-duration bonds with a nominal maturity of 17 years or more. Barclays AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous Municipal Index is a market value weighted index designed to replicate the price movements of medium-duration bonds with a nominal maturity of 6-17 years. Barclays AMT-Free Short Continuous Municipal Index is a market value weighted index designed to replicate the price movements of short-duration bonds with a nominal maturity of 1-6 years.
Market Vectors High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
Market Vectors Intermediate Municipal Index ETF
Market Vectors Short High-Yield Municipal Index ETF
Market Vectors CEF Municipal Income ETF
666 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
ETF Fund shares are not individually redeemable and will be issued and redeemed at the NAV only through certain authorized broker-dealers in large, specified blocks of shares called "creation units" and otherwise can be bought and sold only through exchange trading. Creation units are issued and redeemed principally in kind. Shares may trade at a premium or discount to their NAV in the secondary market.
Investing involves risk, including possible loss of principal. An investor should consider investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the investment company carefully before investing. The prospectus and summary prospectus contain this and other information. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.