Skip directly to Accessibility Notice
  • Guided Allocation

    Market Pulse: Momentum Reinforces Equity Signal

    July 20, 2018

    Price Trends Point to Market Breakdown

    Negative momentum, as measured by the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index’s (NDRCMGLF Index, or the Index) model, has been deepening incrementally since the 80% equity allocation triggered in April. Increased concern over evolving tariff policy and the potential repercussions may have influenced the more recent price action at the industry level, helping to reinforce the model’s 80% equity signal.

    Yield curve flattening, mainly driven by monetary policy, has been another factor potentially weighing on investor concern. While the S&P 500 Index’s top-line return closed the quarter in positive territory, the NDRCMG model’s score has trended lower, gaining some negative momentum over the last few weeks of the second quarter. The model’s score closed the month of June below 65 – its lowest since the Index launched at the end of 2016.

    Year-to-Date Cumulative Return (%): NDRCMGLF Index vs. S&P 500 Index

    1/1/2018 – 6/30//2018

    Asset Class Positioning vs. Neutral Allocation, June 2018

    Source: FactSet. Data as of June 30, 2018. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Index performance is not indicative of fund performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made. Index returns do not reflect a deduction for fees & expenses. See index descriptions and additional disclosures below.

    The Price of Insurance

    In general, the S&P 500 Index’s 2.6% year-to-date performance was positively driven by its allocations to the technology and consumer discretionary sectors, while allocations to the financials and consumer staples sectors detracted from returns.1 However, the NDRCMGLF Index has lagged the S&P 500 by 0.46% (+2.2% vs. +2.6%, respectively) since its model de-risked in April and allocated 20% to T-bills.

    The model informing the Index can only, at most, keep pace with the S&P 500 during bull markets, as it is designed to outperform during market drawdowns by raising cash to limit losses. By limiting significant portfolio drawdowns, investors can be positioned to gain during market rebounds rather than having to spend that time recuperating losses. Underperformance, such as what has been seen year to date, may possibly be considered the cost of insurance toward limiting those losses from a significant market downturn—particularly if that drawdown resembles the magnitude of the last two major recessions in 2008-2009 and 2001-2002.

    As noted, the model’s composite score has trended under 65 more recently. Should the model’s composite score turn up and exhibit a meaningful positive trend, it would trigger a 100% equity allocation. However, if the negative trend persists, pushing the model’s composite score below 60, for example, it would signal greater market breakdown and a 40% equity allocation, as illustrated in the table below.

    Allocations Based on Both the Composite Score and Its Directional Trend

    Allocations Based on Both the Composite Score and Its Directional Trend

    *Note: The composite score zone must be surpassed for the equity allocation change to be in effect. As an example, assuming the composite direction is down; i.e., a deteriorating/declining trend, if the score is 53 and it drops to 50, then the allocation is still 40%. The score must drop below 50 to move the allocation to 0%. Assuming the composite direction is up; i.e., an improving trend, it will always allocate 100% to the S&P 500, regardless of the current composite score. For illustrative purposes only.

    How the NDRCMG Model Works

    The NDRCMGLF Index’s model measures the overall health of the market through an evaluation of market breadth. In this case, market breadth refers to advancing and declining price trends and countertrends at the GICS®2 industry level. The model computes a robust moving average score daily3 to capture multi-industry and multi-term trend and countertrend measures to gauge overall market health. It then calculates the score’s directional trend to see if it is improving or declining. Collectively, the score and its directional trend determine the equity allocation of either 100%, 80%, 40%, or 0% − in which case it would be allocated to cash.4

    Why Market Breadth Is Ideal for Guided Equity Allocation

    There are a few key reasons why measuring market breadth provides sound trend analysis for guiding equity allocations. The Index’s co-developer, Steve Blumenthal of CMG Capital Management Group, Inc., wrote a whitepaper, Risk Management for all Markets, detailing this tactical approach. Mainly, market breadth has typically weakened before top-line prices have at major market peaks and breadth thrusts5 often occur just before major bull market recoveries. Furthermore, the S&P 500 is considered a very efficient market, meaning the underlying securities’ fundamentals and macro environmental factors tend to be priced in almost immediately.

    Investors can access this equity risk-managed approach through VanEck Vectors® NDR CMG Long/Flat Allocation ETF (LFEQ®), which was developed to offer guided equity allocation by trading into and out of the market automatically for its investors. This strategy seeks to minimize losses from potential market drawdowns typical of traditional buy-and-hold or static strategies.