• Muni Nation

    Munis: Finding Value Post Detroit Bankruptcy

    Jim Colby, Portfolio Manager
    August 22, 2013

    Watch my latest video which focuses on:

    • Finding value in municipals now
    • Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association's (SIFMA) letter to the Michigan governor on general obligation (GO) bonds
    • Market outlook for second half of 2013


    Video Transcript 

    Value in Municipals Now

    Recently, and this is going back over the last two months, there's been significant headline risk in fixed-income and the markets in general — beginning with Bernanke's comments about federal reserve tapering come the end of the third quarter of this year, as well as the bankruptcy filing of the city of Detroit. This has produced some dislocation in the municipal marketplace but it has also created some opportunity.

    Over the last 9 to 12 months, interest rates in the muni market have risen anywhere from one to one and a half percent, meaning that there are terrific entry-point opportunities in the marketplace now that had not existed in the better part of two, two and a half years.

    You might ask yourself where on the curve, or what kind of credits should I be interested in? Generally speaking, the intermediate part of the municipal yield curve remains very steep and it remains a point of opportunity, in my view, for anybody thinking about a new spot, or a new time to invest in the municipal marketplace.

    The ETFs that are managed by VanEck Vectors encompass the entire spectrum of investment-grade credits. With some of the better opportunities currently in the A-rated and triple-B rated parts of the credit spectrum, you can be certain that the ETFs VanEck Vectors manages also encompass these types of opportunities.

    SIFMA's Letter to the Michigan Governor on GO Bonds

    As you know, the city of Detroit declared bankruptcy in the middle of July. The emergency manager that has been installed by the governor of the state of Michigan made some comments with regard to how he was going to proceed with negotiations to hopefully bring the city of Detroit out of bankruptcy. Included in some of those comments were representations about the standing of creditors, as well as bondholders, in terms of who was going to get paid and how they were going to get paid. This, amongst other comments made, raised some significant concerns amongst bondholders, as well as SIFMA.

    SIFMA, and I'm going to read from their prepared statements which they sent to the governor of Michigan, was also very concerned about these comments. SIFMA said in their July 18th letter to Governor Rick Snyder, "SIFMA and its members feel investor trust and confidence in the capital markets is the cornerstone to the viability of the municipal market." And the key phrase, I think, in this letter, which they go on to mention later, goes like this: "Any action that would permit general obligation bonds to be treated on a pari passu basis with unsecured contractual obligations that are not backed by the full faith and credit pledge ignores appropriately the priority that should be given to these bonds."

    What does that mean fundamentally? It means that in the construct of issues in the municipal marketplace, a $3.7 trillion industry rests on the back of that phrase, "full faith and credit pledge" of the issuers to make good on their obligation to pay the bonds. And if in fact, as Mr. [Kevyn] Orr [Detroit's emergency manager] would suggest, those bonds do not stand with the appropriate priority relative to other bonds issued, not only does that have serious implications with respect to bondholders for the city of Detroit and the community around Detroit itself, but other parts of the country as well in terms of this implicit promise that is used to build the municipal industry and general obligation bonds.

    Second Half '13 Outlook

    The remaining months of 2013 promise to be a compelling time, in part because we've gone through a significant upheaval in the municipal marketplace. We've seen redemptions occur in bond funds and exchange-traded funds. We have seen credit downgrades. We've seen the bankruptcy of Detroit. We've seen headline risk putting pressure on this marketplace and perhaps forcing a great deal more selling and more upward pressure on interest rates than would otherwise be brought to bear for this particular marketplace.

    Yes, the Federal Reserve ultimately is going to be the determinant of where interest rates are going to go. But given the perspective that the economy is not in a robust state despite some modest gains that are made in employment, housing and other parts of the economy, there's really no reason to expect that interest rates are going to rise again dramatically from here, without some sort of outside agent affecting the direction of the markets.

    My expectation is that this is a good entry point for investors for munis. We may have seen or we may be close to near-term highs in terms of recent rate moves on the upside. Fundamentally, there are great opportunities for picking up value that haven't existed for the better part of two years. Whether you're an intermediate- or a short-term investor, there are compelling reasons to put your money to work in these markets now. Money market rates are still very, very low. The amount of money that you earn on a CD, a treasury bill or a money market fund is de minimus with respect to opportunities that I think exist for investors in the municipal market.

    NOTE: The outcome of the bankruptcy and legal proceedings are uncertain and there is no guarantee of payment.




    This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed in this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

    VanEck does not provide tax, legal or accounting advice. Investors should discuss their individual circumstances with appropriate professionals before making any decisions. This information should not be construed as sales or marketing material or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument, product or service.

    Please note that MUNI NATION® represents the opinions of the author and these opinions may change at any time and from time to time. Not intended to be a forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results or investment advice. Current market conditions may not continue. Non-VanEck proprietary information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but not guaranteed. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck. MUNI NATION is a trademark of Van Eck Associates Corporation.

    All indices listed are unmanaged indices and do not reflect the payment of transaction costs, advisory fees or expenses that are associated with an investment in a fund. An index’s performance is not illustrative of a fund’s performance. Indices are not securities in which investments can be made.

    Municipal bonds are subject to risks related to litigation, legislation, political change, conditions in underlying sectors or in local business communities and economies, bankruptcy or other changes in the issuer’s financial condition, and/or the discontinuance of taxes supporting the project or assets or the inability to collect revenues for the project or from the assets. Additional risks include credit, interest rate, call, reinvestment, tax, market and lease obligation risk. High-yield municipal bonds are subject to greater risk of loss of income and principal than higher-rated securities, and are likely to be more sensitive to adverse economic changes or individual municipal developments than those of higher-rated securities. Municipal bonds may be less liquid than taxable bonds.

    The income generated from some types of municipal bonds may be subject to state and local taxes as well as to federal taxes on capital gains and may also be subject to alternative minimum tax.

    Diversification does not assure a profit or protect against loss.

    Investing involves substantial risk and high volatility, including possible loss of principal. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. An investor should consider the investment objective, risks, charges and expenses of a fund carefully before investing. To obtain a prospectus and summary prospectus which contain this and other information, call 800.826.2333 or visit vaneck.com. Please read the prospectus and summary prospectus carefully before investing.

    Van Eck Securities Corporation, Distributor
    666 Third Avenue
    New York, NY 10017