Economic Policies – Keep It Simple
18 November 2022
Read Time 2 MIN
Brazil Fiscal Debates
I learned two new economic terms this week - “macrosynergy” and “quantamental”. They sound remarkably clever, but simple concepts/frameworks work just fine most of the time. For example, if you mess up with fiscal accounts – your bonds and the currency get hit. One of my Twitter counterparts “demanded” a multi-factor attribution analysis of Brazil’s relative underperformance after the runoff (R-squares and stuff), but I think it boils down to the fact that the market had high expectations (President-elect Lula-the-pragmatist), which got crushed by reality (Lula-the-populist pushing for more spending). The market’s elevated positioning in Brazil started to clear off after Lula’s victory (see chart below for net longs in the Brazilian real), but there is still room for further unwinding, if policy uncertainty continues. So, we keep watching Brazil’s fiscal debates as hawks. The probability of a “warning shot” from the Brazilian central bank (ending the pause and raising the policy rate) is getting higher in this environment.
EM Growth and Current Account Gaps
Brazil’s saving grace is its external metric – huge international reserves and a basic balance surplus (a sum of current account and foreign direct investments). But one regional example shows what could happen when there is too much domestic stimulus amidst slowing external demand. The Chilean economy already started to cool – it posted negative sequential and flat annual GDP growth in Q3 – but imports (fueled by multiple withdrawals from private pension funds) are still at multi-decade highs. As a result, the trailing current account deficit widened to nearly 10% of GDP in Q3. The consensus expects Chile to slide into recession in 2023, which should help to reduce the current account gap. However, Chile’s ability to maintain its fiscal discipline will matter even more against this backdrop – double-digit financing requirements can send a bad signal to the bond market.
EM External Balances
Chile’s current account deterioration is not the only cautionary tale – wider external gaps in Central Europe and Turkey are also concerning. South Africa’s current account posted a surprising deficit (1.3% of GDP) in Q2 – a potential challenge for the central bank, which had already accelerated the pace of rate hikes. However, there are also “comeback kid” stories in EM – Thailand’s current account flipped into surplus in September, and the consensus expects a healthy surplus of 2.2% of GDP in 2023 (and an even larger surplus in 2024). Indonesia’s current account surplus surprised to the upside in Q3, widening to USD4.4B, providing a nice fundamental support for the currency (in addition to the central bank’s proactive tightening). Stay tuned!
Chart at a Glance: Brazil – Great Expectations… Crushed?

Source: Bloomberg LP.
* GSCPI Index: Global Supply Chain Pressure Index seeks to measure supply chain conditions, created by the Federal Reserve. The index combines variables from several indices in transportation and manufacturing
Related Insights
06 marzo 2025
20 febrero 2025
16 enero 2025
07 abril 2025
Los aranceles de Trump avivan los temores de una guerra comercial, impulsando la volatilidad del mercado, el riesgo inflacionario y la amenaza de una recesión. Ante posibles represalias globales, el crecimiento a corto plazo corre un riesgo evidente.
06 marzo 2025
Los aranceles de Trump, la próxima fase de la IA y una posible revalorización del oro estadounidense podrían sacudir los mercados; los inversores que se adelanten a estas transiciones estarán mejor posicionados.
20 febrero 2025
El avance de la IA en China, la persistente inflación, el rendimiento superior del oro y el aumento de la demanda energética ponen de relieve un panorama de inversión cambiante.
16 enero 2025
En 2025, superar los problemas significa equilibrar la innovación tecnológica, las coberturas contra la inflación, los cambios energéticos y los riesgos derivados de los recortes del gasto y la inflación.
05 diciembre 2024
"Trump Trade 2.0" impulsó los repuntes de las acciones estadounidenses y los activos digitales, mientras que los activos reales se tambalearon debido a un dólar fuerte, con los mercados mundiales reaccionando de forma desigual a las políticas favorables al crecimiento.