• Investment Outlook

    Investment Outlook: Time to Hedge Against Central Bank Uncertainty?

    Jan van Eck, CEO
    11 October 2019
     

    Negative Interest Rates Fuel Gold Breakout

    The biggest event in the markets this past summer was the surge in negative-yielding debt to $14 trillion.Already, this has led to some excitement in alternative assets, with gold breaking through a very strong technical six-year mark around the same time. I think this is the time for investors to look at how they hedge against central bank uncertainty through the end of this year and into 2020.

    The first dimension supporting gold is just that low rates make gold look attractive. High interest rate environments tend to be tough for gold as gold does not pay any yield, but against negative interest rates, gold looks much more attractive.

    Negative Yielding Bonds and Gold

    Source: Bloomberg. Data as of 23 September 2019.

    The second dimension supporting gold is the concern about whether central banks have lost their power to stimulate the economy. Despite moves by the European Central Bank to stimulate the European economy over the past several years, Europe continues to slow down and is probably the weakest region in the world. If Europe is caught in a trap and central banks have lost their power, then concern about huge debt levels may drive investors to gold. Interestingly, other central banks, like Russia and China, have been big buyers of gold recently. Maybe they are worried, too.

    Are the Strong Inflows to Bond Funds Driven by Fear or Greed?

    My biggest concern is that investors are becoming excessively conservative in their fixed income portfolios, driven by fears of the trade war and global recession. As I mentioned in my last outlook, many investors have been too focused on short-term and high quality fixed income. The tendency is for investors—if they fear that lower interest rates may mean a global recession is coming—to go to short-term bonds and money market funds. However, this gives them very low yields, and I think this approach is a mistake in the current environment. In my view, slow but steady growth in China suggests that we are not headed for a global recession, so I am not sure that there should be any concern about a normal credit allocation.

    China has continued to be relatively constrained on the monetary policy front, and we believe the central bank does not intend to flood the system with cheap credit. While this may lead to lower growth, we believe the growth will be both more stable and of higher quality. Ultimately, I think that’s good for fixed income investors. For more insights on China, see our regular updates on China’s economic growth.

    Emerging markets debt is one asset class that I think became more appealing this summer. Last year, it offered attractive yields and valuations, and towards the end of 2018, presented an opportunity to diversify against U.S. stocks. We now actually have several positive stories to highlight. Brazil, a major leader in South America, has been implementing pro-growth reforms, and India, surprisingly, has just announced big corporate tax cuts, which I believe are going to be very stimulative for its economy. In addition to the value story we saw in emerging markets debt heading into 2019, I think that now we are also seeing positive and exciting economic reforms that have the potential to fuel this asset class.

    Ignore Politics in Your Portfolio

    The trade war between the U.S. and China was in the headlines this summer and will probably continue to be in the headlines. My strong feeling in response to that is: ignore politics in your portfolio.

    One long-standing truth I learned when I came into the industry over two decades ago was that you cannot anticipate political events. We learned that lesson over and over this summer. What President Donald Trump is going to tweet around the trade war is unpredictable. Everyone in the market was surprised by how the election in Argentina turned out. And then there was the military attack on the Saudi Arabian oil facility. I don’t believe that investors can guide their portfolios around these political events.

    1Source: Bloomberg.


  • Important Disclosure

    For informational and advertising purposes only.

    This commentary originates from VanEck Investments Ltd, a UCITS Management Company under Irish law regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and VanEck Asset Management B.V., a UCITS Management Company under Dutch law regulated by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets. It is intended only to provide general and preliminary information to investors and shall not be construed as investment, legal or tax advice. VanEck Investments Ltd, VanEck Asset Management B.V. and its associated and affiliated companies (together “VanEck”) assume no liability with regards to any investment, divestment or retention decision taken by the investor on the basis of this commentary. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) but not necessarily those of VanEck. Opinions are current as of the commentary’s publication date and are subject to change with market conditions. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. All indices mentioned are measures of common market sectors and performance. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

    All performance information is historical and is no guarantee of future results. Investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of principal. You must read the Prospectus and KIID before investing in a fund.

    No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission of VanEck.

    © VanEck Investments Ltd / VanEck Asset Management B.V.