Why Bitcoin is Rallying

Please note that VanEck may have a position(s) in the digital asset(s) described below.

Watch Matthew Sigel’s recent webinar: Banking Troubles Boost Bitcoin

Market Update: Why Did Bitcoin and Other Digital Assets Rally After the Turmoil with U.S. Banks?

• The subsequent bailout of Silicon Valley Bank depositors highlighted the appeal of bearer assets, which can be self-custodied and whose monetary policy is independent of poor central bank policymaking. Ironically, Silicon Valley Bank partially failed due to too-large bets on the perceived safe-haven assets: U.S. Treasuries and U.S. Mortgage-Backed Agency debt.
• U.S. CDS spreads rose above their 2011 highs, baking in a bigger fight over legislated bailouts and the looming debt ceiling. With scant political consensus for legislation, we expect more money printing, dollar debasement, and, over the medium term, probably more treasury selling by our significant creditors, several of whom the U.S. government is now sanctioning. It’s probably not a great time to be a G7 creditor...
• Also, by the way, the Swedish Central Bank recently mentioned it needs a bailout from the Swedish Treasury amidst news that a major Swedish pension fund was a top 6 shareholder in Signature, SVB, and First Republic. We think Bitcoin would be well-positioned if further bank share weakness prompts news flow like that.

Current Bitcoin Cycle Looks Familiar

Source: Arcana. Data as of 2/4/2023. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended as a prediction of future results.

Two Macro Bull Arguments for Bitcoin:

• The U.S. government has amassed an amazing amount of debt and the only way to overcome this, long-term, is to debase the value of the dollar. Whether debt limit and other spending fights or a recession triggers this—or whether the tipping point happens in the next decades—is unknowable, but Bitcoin may serve as a hedge to this (as may gold).
• Central banks bought record amounts of gold in 2022. Countries on the fringes of the financial system continue to see both economic and negotiating value in adopting private, censorship resistant bearer assets. We expect a “big bang” at some point, such as Saudi Arabia officially buying Bitcoin for its state reserves.

Seven Technical Arguments for Bitcoin:

• Bitcoin’s 30-day volatility plunged below that of the S&P 500 Index’s in early January, as both buyers and sellers looked elsewhere amidst declining liquidity. Given the history of the asset, we don’t think this is sustainable.
• Historically, Bitcoin has never fallen for two consecutive calendar years.
• The current bear market (duration) exceeds the average of 380 days.
• The current bear market (magnitude), at 77%, is close enough to the average (-83%) to justify beginning a dollar cost average approach for cyclical bears.
• November saw meaningful capitulation from long-term holders (6 months+), who realized two of the largest loss spikes in history, peaking at levels similar to the 2015 and 2018 cycle lows.
• Bitcoin is highly correlated to M2 growth, which recently hit 0% y/y in the U.S. for the first time ever. But globally, money supply growth already bottomed in November. In fact, the three-month rate of global money supply change now exceeds the 12-month rate of change, historically a very positive indicator for a Bitcoin bottom (Figure 1). In the U.S., money supply will likely re-accelerate, as government deficits continue. Meanwhile outside the US, China money supply is now growing at 12%, a 5-year high, and the RMB is strengthening. Both are historically a tailwind for the Bitcoin price. Investors focusing only on the Fed may be missing the improving global liquidity (Figure 2).
• Bitcoin leverage ratio has fallen sharply, and both calendar futures and perpetual swaps have recently traded in a state of backwardation. This suggests the market was heavily hedged for further downside risk.

Figure 1: Bitcoin Price vs. Global Money Supply Growth

Source: Bloomberg. Data as of 1/25/2023. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities referenced herein.

Figure 2: Global Money Supply Growth Has Re-Accelerated—Just Not in the U.S.

Source: Bloomberg, VanEck Research. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Seven Bear Arguments for Bitcoin:

• Regulation continues to tighten, as the consequences of the Biden executive order work their way through federal agencies. The lack of a Bitcoin spot ETF serves as a powerful symbol from U.S. regulators that the asset is not fit for traditional fiduciaries.
• Localities such as New York State and Canada’s British Columbia have put moratoriums on fossil-fuel based Bitcoin mining, hoping to restrict Bitcoin’s high energy usage.
• U.S. stocks and bonds have both fallen in the same calendar year only three times in history. In two of the three (1931 and 1969) the U.S. devalued vs. gold within two years by restricting convertibility. If 2022’s losses predict accelerating capital controls, then Bitcoin price may suffer.
• Recent Federal Reserve minutes reveal that FOMC members still see risks tilted to inflation (not balanced) and are concerned about “an unwarranted easing in financial conditions, especially if driven by a mis-perception by the public of the Committee’s reaction function.”
• Bitcoin mining hash rate is too high relative to the price to provide a profitable backdrop for miners. Thus, in the absence of lower energy prices, miners are likely to continue to sell coins to pay for operating expenses, which is negative for supply/demand balance.
• Bitcoin’s “security budget” faces structural issues (in coming decades) as current, low transaction fees provide insufficient motivation for miners to secure the blockchain. As block rewards fall, the network will either become less secure, the price will rise, or the community will agree on a new model increasing the proposed 21M cap.
• Bitcoin’s lack of smart contract functionality is hindering adoption. Sidechains like Liquid have disappointed. Lightning is interesting, but is not permitted in NY State and overall volumes remain low.

Focusing on the more credible medium-term bear cases, we address 1) the mining moratoriums, 2) general regulatory headwinds and 3) Bitcoin’s fee problem and disappointing layer 2 traction.

On the mining side, we think some of the moratoriums are structural and some are cyclical. For example, Kazakhstan and Iran recently reportedly loosened some Bitcoin mining restrictions and returned some seized mining machines amidst lower energy prices and weaker economic activity. Russia also signaled plans to build more power generation capacity in Siberia in order to satisfy energy demand from Bitcoin miners.

If and as inflation eases and policymakers embrace more pragmatic approaches to energy sustainability (such as an “all of the above” approach including natural gas and nuclear), innovation and pro-growth perspectives may re-emerge. For context, Bitcoin mining consumes approximately the same amount of energy as U.S. Christmas lights. Traditional payments rails consume 12x more electricity than the Bitcoin network, whose energy usage scales with hash rate (economic security), not with the number of transactions.

The tighter regulatory environment, especially in the U.S., is not easily reversed. Specifically, Biden’s executive order in January 2022 focused multiple agencies on addressing “the risks…of digital assets” with a focus on consumer and investor protection and countering illicit finance. These actions, along with confidence-shattering events like the bankruptcies of FTX, Celsius and 3AC, clearly slowed Bitcoin’s market share gains vs. banks. The January 3 joint statement from the Federal Reserve, the FDIC and the OCC punctuated the coordinated regulation with this crucial line: "Based on the agencies’ current understanding and experience to date, the agencies believe that issuing or holding as principal crypto-assets that are issued, stored, or transferred on an open, public, and/or decentralized network, or similar system is highly likely to be inconsistent with safe and sound banking practices.”

Perhaps the best we can hope for this year is a stalemate in Washington, D.C. that prevents harmful over-regulation, while waiting for the market to turn its attention to 2024 and the possibility of the first pro-Bitcoin President in the form of Republican front-runner FL governor Ron DeSantis. One of our predictions in our 2023 crypto outlook is that SEC Chair Gary Gensler would leave the SEC this year after a victory vs. Ripple in the ongoing case over unregistered securities. While most may consider this a longshot, we note that the median SEC Chair tenure is only two years.

On Bitcoin’s transaction fee problem and disappointing layer 2 progress: despite sporting the largest market capitalization among cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin’s transaction fees rank #4, after Ethereum, Uniswap, and Binance Smart Chain. The fact that people pay fees to use these other blockchains that exceed (by an order of magnitude, in the case of Ethereum), the fees paid to use Bitcoin indicates there’s a material, market-based demand for these alternative blockspaces.

Bitcoin maximalists that deny this are denying the markets and clear evidence. Over the long-run, fees will have to rise, the Bitcoin price will have to rise, or the community will have to reconsider the 21M cap. Now, one wrinkle in this bear case to consider is the continued adoption of the Segwit soft fork, which removed Bitcoin transaction malleability (the ability of a transaction to have multiple valid TX IDs) and thus enabled the launch of the Lightning Network as a second layer on top of Bitcoin. Since Segwit and again following the 2021 Taproot upgrade to Segwit, each time Bitcoin transaction fees have spiked, Segwit adoption has risen anew, thanks to cheaper transaction fees for layer 2s. Thus, Lightning network capacity grew 46% in 2022 to 4,400 BTC, or $70M at the current BTC rate, even with lackluster BTC fee growth.

While we are encouraged by recent Lightning network integrations from Twitter and Stripe, it seems that commercial backers of Lightning, such as Jack Mallers’ Strike, will need to get NY State regulatory approval before onboarding the mass payments market, and this seems a way off. For example, CashApp just enabled Bitcoin payments on top of Lightning for all users except those in NY. One development that may enable an end-run around NYDFS is Fediment, a “community custody” tool built around Bitcoin that enables users to form groups where members look out for each other’s coins. Fediment also provides full anonymity by using blind signatures to ensure users cannot be linked to the minting process that created their tokens. Taro is another Lightning Network upgrade that enables the issuance of assets and collectibile on Bitcoin that may include Tether or other stablecoins. On the back of these upgrades, Lightning may yet find product-market fit in emerging markets where Bitcoin and stablecoin adoption are higher and trust in banking systems is lower. But, that seems increasingly unlikely to be a near-term story in developed markets.

Source: VanEck Research. Not intended as a prediction or forecast of a future state or events.

Our Conclusion: $250K Price Target Remains in Place

As a call option on an alternative financial future in which U.S. dollar hegemony is decidedly less pronounced, Bitcoin retains attractive properties due to its max decentralization and (currently) fixed supply. While developed markets adoption may decelerate somewhat due to the reverberations of so many bankruptcies, and tighter global liquidity, our research in emerging markets continues to surface strong demand for Bitcoin and stablecoins amidst a generally lighter regulatory touch. We keep our $250k/Bitcoin long-term price target (half the market cap of Gold), pushing the target date to 2028, another halving year. If Bitcoin price does not make a new all-time high by 2026, we would consider our thesis broken. We believe a 1-3% allocation to open-source blockchain-based digital assets, such as Bitcoin and other smart contract protocols, is reasonable at this time given our research.

Figure 3: Bitcoin’s Market-Cap to Realized-Market Cap

(Value below 1 indicates coins being sold for a loss; typically a bottom indicator, indicating capitulation)

Sources: Cryptoquant, Cryptofees, Bloomberg, Lyn Alden Investment Strategy, Castle Island Ventures, Obi Nwosu (CEO, Fedi Inc), Michael Khazzaka (ValueChain), VanEck Research. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Not intended as a recommendation to buy or sell any securities referenced herein.

To receive more Digital Assets insights, sign up in our subscription center.