Skip directly to Accessibility Notice
  • Emerging Markets Bonds

    What Sets Chinese Bonds Apart?

    Fran Rodilosso, Head of Fixed Income ETF Portfolio Management, CFA
    March 09, 2021
     

    We have noted previously some of the attractive features of onshore Chinese bonds, particularly the currently attractive yield pickup of Chinese bonds against U.S. Treasuries. This yield pickup remains significant despite the recent selloff in U.S. rates this year while China bond yields have remained steady. Furthermore, the performance profile of the Chinese bond market sets it apart from other emerging markets bond markets. We believe a targeted exposure to China onshore bonds beyond what is available in a broader global exposure may be worth a closer look.

    Most market participants and index providers consider China to be an emerging market, and by many traditional measures, it is (e.g. per capita income). At the same time, the Chinese bond market has unique features that distinguish it from the broader emerging markets. It is the second largest bond market globally—second only to the U.S.—meaning that its depth and breadth sets it apart from other emerging markets. Its currency plays an increasingly important role in global trade, and unlike other emerging markets, China is a primary driver, rather than beneficiary, of global growth.

    We compare below the performance of the Chinese aggregate bond market (which includes sovereigns, policy banks and corporate bonds), against emerging markets and U.S. aggregate bonds. A few notable time periods are worth highlighting. First, Chinese bonds avoided the severe drawdown that emerging markets bonds experienced in early 2020, despite being the epicenter of the pandemic at the time.

    Chinese bonds have outperformed U.S. aggregate bonds over the long-term, and have significantly outperformed year to date through February 28, 2021 amid a sharp increase in U.S. interest rates. Compared to emerging markets aggregate bonds, Chinese onshore bonds have provided slightly higher long term performance but without the same boom and bust return profile. From a risk-adjusted standpoint, measured by Sharpe ratio, Chinese onshore bonds look attractive relative to emerging markets aggregate bonds and in line with U.S. aggregate bonds (but with higher absolute returns).

    China Onshore Bonds Compare Favorably to U.S. and EM Bonds

    China Onshore Bonds Compare Favorably to U.S. and EM Bonds

      Return as of 2/28/2021  
      YTD 1
    Year
    3
    Years
    5
    Years
    Since
    2/2012
    Std
    Dev
    Sharpe
    Ratio
    Yield Duration
    Onshore China Bonds 0.44 9.28 4.56 3.80 4.11 4.53 0.76 3.72% 3.93
    Emerging Markets Aggregate Bonds -2.99 4.08 4.43 6.58 3.91 7.96 0.44 3.77% 6.46
    U.S. Aggregate Bonds -2.15 1.38 5.32 3.55 3.03 3.03 0.79 1.42% 6.31

    Source: Morningstar, MVIS, Bloomberg Barclays, and ChinaBond as of 2/28/2021. Onshore China Bonds is represented by the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index; Emerging Markets Aggregate Bonds is represented by the MVIS® EM Aggregate Bond Index; U.S. Aggregate Bonds is represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Standard Deviation and Sharpe ratio are based on monthly returns from February 2012 to February 2021. Yield and duration are as of 1/31/2021.

    At the same time, as shown in the table above, the yield and duration profile of Chinese onshore bonds is attractive. The Chinese bond index includes A+/A1 rated sovereign and policy banks, and bonds rated AAA by local rating agencies, which generally corresponds to investment grade, while the broad emerging markets index has significant high yield exposure. Considering the quality difference versus emerging markets bonds, the similarity in overall yield may be attractive.

    From a portfolio construction perspective, Chinese bonds may offer additional benefits. Over the past five years, the correlation of Chinese bonds to U.S. aggregate bonds is very low (0.10), indicating potential diversification benefits.1 Correlation to broad emerging markets bonds is also quite low (0.36), and lower than that of the U.S. aggregate (0.42) or global aggregate (0.71) bond benchmarks.2 Chinese bonds, particularly sovereigns, are included in most global benchmarks but at relatively small weights when compared to the size of the country’s bond market. Outsized exposure brings country specific risks, including the potential for increased defaults in the corporate sector. However the unique characteristics of the market performance profile relative to other emerging markets bonds may provide support to increasing exposure to China onshore bonds beyond what can be obtained through a broader global exposure.

    DISCLOSURE

    1 Source: Morningstar, as of 2/28/2021. Onshore China Bonds is represented by the ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index; U.S. Aggregate Bonds is represented by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index.

    2 Source: Morningstar, as of 2/28/2021. Emerging Markets Bonds is represented by the MVIS® EM Aggregate Bond Index. Global Aggregate Bonds is represented by Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index.

    Please note that VanEck may offer investments products that invest in the asset class(es) or industries included herein.

    ChinaBond China High Quality Bond Index comprised of fixed-rate, Renminbi-denominated bonds issued in the People's Republic of China by Chinese credit, governmental and quasi-governmental (e.g., policy banks) issuers.

    MVIS® EM Aggregate Bond Index is a modified market cap-weighted index that tracks the performance of emerging markets sovereign bonds and corporate bonds denominated in USD, EUR or local emerging markets currencies.

    Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. This includes treasuries, government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage-backed securities.

    Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index measures global investment grade debt from 24 local currency markets. It includes treasury, government-related, corporate, and securitized fixed-rate bonds from both developed and emerging markets issuers.

    This content is published in the United States for residents of specified countries. Investors are subject to securities and tax regulations within their applicable jurisdictions that are not addressed in this content. Nothing in this content should be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell shares of any investment in any jurisdiction where the offer or solicitation would be unlawful under the securities laws of such jurisdiction, nor is it intended as investment, tax, financial, or legal advice. Investors should seek such professional advice for their particular situation and jurisdiction.

    This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.

    All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

  • Authored by

    Fran Rodilosso
    Head of Fixed Income ETF Portfolio Management, CFA

    Explore My Insights