Skip directly to Accessibility Notice

High Yield Offering “High Yields” Again

October 14, 2022

Read Time 6 MIN

We believe fallen angels may look attractive over the next year with the carry now offsetting a 1.43% rise in yield from rates or spreads.

Fallen angels underperformed broad high yield (HY) by 0.37% in September -4.39% vs. -4.02%) and were in line in Q3 (-0.68% for both strategies) but are still behind 2.72% on the YTD figure (-17.34% vs. -14.62%). In Q3, duration has continued to be the primary driver of returns, with a monthly return in the 95% percentile (since 2003) as rates declined. But that was not repeated in August and September as yields continued their climb upwards, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield almost reaching 4% by the end of the quarter.

As shown below, risk-free rates are now significantly higher than they were at the beginning of the year, and we believe there may now be opportunities to add exposure across fixed income asset classes, including high yield, which is back offering “high yields.”

US Treasury Yield Curve

US Treasury Yield Curve

Source: US Treasury. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Yields on Fallen Angel Bonds at Pre-Great Recession Levels

Fallen angels are offering a yield to worst of 7.95% and broad HY of 9.57%, which are levels that haven’t been sustained (outside of major selloff periods) since before the GFC. This increase in overall yield has been driven by the normalization of interest rates. Credit spreads have outperformed equities, reflecting generally strong credit fundamentals. However, rate volatility has driven spreads upwards, and broad high yield is back around 500 basis points, not far from the long-term average since 2003. Fallen angel credit spreads are still below the long-term average. That being said, changes in credit quality should be considered when comparing current levels to long-term averages. The fallen angel universe remains close to 90% BB rated (the highest rating category within high yield), compared to an average of 73% since 2003. The current average spread of fallen angels is just slightly below the long-term average once adjusting for current credit quality.

The chart below shows how the fallen angel index rating allocation has changed over time relative to the average spread.

Yields on Fallen Angel Bonds at Pre-Great Recession Levels

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Although the risk of wider spreads in this uncertain environment is a concern, adding exposure at much higher yield levels means that carry could now play a much greater role in driving returns going forward and also provide a significant cushion against wider overall yields that could result from wider spreads (which would likely coincide with lower interest rates, offsetting the price impact to some extent). For example, at the end of September, the carry earned from fallen angels could offset a rise in overall yield over the next 12 months of 1.43%, which could conceivably allow an investor to breakeven over the period if interest rates or spreads were to rise by that amount. As a comparison, the breakeven level at the beginning of the year was only 0.49%. In other words, expected returns for bonds are much higher today, and further increases in yields have a lower impact on forward returns at this point, given the higher levels of carry being earned.

Fallen Angel Bonds Price Hits New YTD-Low

Lastly, as we previously wrote, we cannot forget about the fallen angel price. On 6/30, the average price was $88.47, and by the end of last month, it was $86.14, a new YTD-low, with the average price, since December 2003, dropping to $95.74. Current average prices are approaching those seen during the 2016 energy downgrades price of $84.01 and Covid at $83.30. Again, it is key to recognize that the prior price declines were driven by new fallen angels entering the index at discounted prices, while this time, it is higher interest rates. In fact, this has been one of the lowest years on record for new fallen angel volume.

Fallen Angels Price

Fallen Angels Price

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Fallen Angel Bonds Overall Stats

Fallen angels YTW is now 7.95%, a 2.3x increase since the beginning of the year, and although broad HY is now the highest it’s been since the end of 2009, it hasn’t increased by more than the fallen angels. Fallen angel duration keeps shortening, a trend since the beginning of the year, whereas broad HY shortened for the first time this past quarter, but it’s extended YTD. Spreads retreated a bit over this past quarter but widened over the last weeks as the Fed announced more rate hikes.

  Fallen Angel Broad HY
  12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22
Yield to Worst 3.42 5.01 7.43 7.95 4.32 6.03 8.94 9.57
Effective Duration 6.97 6.14 5.70 5.51 4.04 4.18 4.45 4.25
Full Market Value ($mn) 196,932 142,481 116,331 110,598 1,610,169 1,461,914 1,258,523 1,201,286
OAS 211 262 435 385 310 371 587 543
No. of Issues 262 225 214 211 2,123 2,051 1,996 1,961

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

New Fallen Angel Bonds

A couple of new fallen angels entered the index over Q3. Ohio National Financial Services entered in July after Moody’s downgraded it, reflecting the company's weakened market position and challenges supporting growth plans in its businesses. In August, two new fallen angels entered the index: Pacific Western Bank and Toledo Hospital. Fitch downgraded Pacific Western Bank, citing the company's recent decline in capital reserves as some recent acquisitions have put pressure on their capital levels. S&P downgraded Toledo Hospital as there has been an acceleration in losses beyond expectations. Over the last 6 months, Ohio National Financial Services saw its price deteriorate by ~13%, Pacific by ~9%, while Toledo Hospital's price deteriorated by ~40%. With these two new issues, the count of fallen angels this year is now 5, adding 5.18% weight this year. With the current economic environment, there may continue to be some fallen angels, mostly idiosyncratic in nature.

Month-end Addition Name Rating Sector Industry % Mkt Value Price
April Steelcase Inc BB1 Services Support-Services 0.36 97.82
June Las Vegas Sands BB1 Leisure Gaming 3.32 89.72
July Ohio National Financial Services BB1 Insurance Life Insurance 0.59 99.87
August Pacific Western Bank BB1 Banking Banking 0.33 89.61
August Toledo Hospital BB1 Healthcare Health Facilities 0.58 63.58

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Rising Stars

Only one new rising star in Q3: DCP Midstream, removing 1.36% weight of the index. DCP was a fallen angel back in early 2015. It posted a price return of ~-16% over the last 12 months in the index, which despite being negative, was in line with broad HY price return over the same period. There have been 6 rising stars this year, removing 16.41% from the index.

Month-end Exit Name Rating Sector Industry % Mkt Value Price
January Freeport-Mcmoran Inc BB1 Basic Industry Metals/Mining Excluding Steel 2.73 111.46
March EQT Corporation BB1 Energy Energy - Exploration & Production 2.00 105.82
March Kraft Heinz Foods Company BB1 Consumer Goods Food - Wholesale 9.70 106.50
April Michael Kors (USA) Inc BB1 Retail Specialty Retail 0.35 97.50
May HCA BB1 Healthcare Health Facilities 0.27 108.75
August DCP Midstream BB1 Energy Gas Distribution 1.36 103.57

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell securities mentioned.

Fallen Angel Bonds Performance by Sector

Q3 didn’t bring any major changes in terms of sector allocations; the Energy saw a reduction of its 30% weight since DCP exited the index. There were 4 sectors in which spreads narrowed by more than 100bps: Basic Industry, Insurance, Leisure, and Real Estate, which make up about 14% on September month end, with Leisure being the top weight as Las Vegas Sand entered the index in June. All these four sectors posted positive returns, an average of +1.64% for the quarter. In terms of price, about 80% of the sectors are trading in the $80-90 bucket, ~12% in the $90s, and ~9% in the $70s.

  Wgt (%) OAS Price Total Return (%)
  12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 QTD YTD
Automotive 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 147 215 362 335 109.85 100.73 91.02 88.13 -1.73 -16.53
Banking 4.07 5.38 4.82 5.25 125 200 361 356 114.90 105.96 99.78 96.03 -1.66 -13.49
Basic Industry 4.25 1.45 1.52 1.33 173 243 395 282 112.44 99.68 87.23 88.73 1.81 -14.85
Capital Goods 4.12 5.45 5.57 5.82 225 259 450 382 110.72 102.45 90.95 90.64 1.07 -14.41
Consumer Goods 12.95 3.67 3.05 3.05 142 220 329 307 120.43 102.47 91.03 87.82 -2.13 -21.58
Energy 28.04 30.47 30.14 28.29 240 260 405 334 106.42 98.06 87.28 85.78 0.68 -16.00
Financial Services 1.03 0.59 0.62 0.62 240 469 623 602 101.37 88.09 76.27 73.79 -1.77 -19.79
Healthcare 1.98 2.37 2.32 3.01 180 218 364 407 106.51 98.95 89.91 81.21 -0.84 -12.44
Insurance 0.46 0.63 0.45 1.10 283 272 440 323 104.28 99.90 88.68 91.98 1.13 -10.24
Leisure 3.76 4.76 7.58 7.83 269 288 497 381 105.75 100.73 89.22 88.68 0.69 -10.24
Real Estate 2.72 3.67 3.31 3.48 413 425 981 809 97.12 92.32 75.80 76.97 2.92 -15.56
Retail 4.78 5.96 5.22 5.13 270 284 595 605 101.96 94.63 75.83 71.40 -4.27 -25.43
Services 0.39 0.54 0.39 0.37 87 132 342 409 103.86 101.09 93.07 85.55 -6.80 -11.21
Technology & Electronics 3.44 3.83 4.12 3.64 176 216 347 374 109.25 101.87 91.82 85.41 -4.86 -18.04
Telecommunications 9.11 11.71 12.00 12.05 283 340 486 456 121.24 108.57 92.68 88.35 -2.72 -22.74
Transportation 1.66 2.22 2.02 2.09 221 259 413 358 104.18 97.06 89.34 87.59 -0.75 -11.97
Utility 7.24 7.29 6.86 6.91 158 203 304 244 109.46 102.06 89.02 87.76 -0.16 -15.71
Total 100 100 100 100 211 262 435 385 110.07 100.35 88.47 86.14 -0.68 -17.34

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Fallen Angel Bonds Performance by Rating

Excluding the CC-bucket (which only includes one issuer), higher quality has outperformed, despite still posting negative returns, its lower-rated peers YTD – something expected as high quality tends to outperform in periods with higher volatility. Generally speaking, high-quality, high yield firms may better adapt to the transition to a later stage of the business cycle. We believe the higher quality tilt of fallen angels may provide a strong cushion against more spread widening and volatility.

  Wgt (%) OAS Price Total Return (%)
  12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 12/31/21 3/31/22 6/30/22 9/30/22 QTD YTD
BB 94.49 90.11 90.49 90.58 200 244 389 333 110.70 101.22 90.17 88.13 -0.93 -16.94
B 4.08 7.84 7.35 7.84 319 387 887 755 105.75 94.95 76.05 77.03 2.08 -20.83
CCC 1.13 1.51 1.65 1.08 425 478 726 1635 102.99 94.78 79.92 49.75 0.85 -21.32
CC 0.31 0.54 0.50 0.50 1,346 962 1,308 1,310 55.99 68.92 52.79 50.48 -1.00 -1.51
Total 100 100 100 100 211 262 435 385 110.07 100.35 88.47 86.14 -0.68 -17.34

Source: ICE Data Services and VanEck as of 9/30/2022.

To receive more Income Investing insights, sign up in our subscription center.

Disclosures

Please note that VanEck may offer investments products that invest in the asset class(es) or industries included in this blog.

Data throughout sourced from ICE Data Services and VanEck.

Index returns are not Fund returns and do not reflect any management fees or brokerage expenses. Certain indices may take into account withholding taxes. Investors cannot invest directly in the Index.

A fallen angel bond is a bond that was initially given an investment-grade rating but has since been reduced to junk bond status.

High yield bonds may be subject to greater risk of loss of income and principal and are likely to be more sensitive to adverse economic changes than higher rated securities.

A rising star is a high yield bond that is upgraded to investment grade.

This is not an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation to buy or sell any of the securities/financial instruments mentioned herein. The information presented does not involve the rendering of personalized investment, financial, legal, or tax advice. Certain statements contained herein may constitute projections, forecasts and other forward looking statements, which do not reflect actual results, are valid as of the date of this communication and subject to change without notice. Information provided by third party sources are believed to be reliable and have not been independently verified for accuracy or completeness and cannot be guaranteed. VanEck does not guarantee the accuracy of third party data. The information herein represents the opinion of the author(s), but not necessarily those of VanEck.

There are inherent risks with fixed income investing. These risks may include interest rate, call, credit, market, inflation, government policy, liquidity, or junk bond. When interest rates rise, bond prices fall. This risk is heightened with investments in longer duration fixed-income securities and during periods when prevailing interest rates are low or negative.

ICE BofA US High Yield Index (H0A0, “Broad HY Index”), formerly known as BofA Merrill Lynch US High Yield Index prior to 10/23/2017, is comprised of below-investment grade corporate bonds (based on an average of various rating agencies) denominated in U.S. dollars.

ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index (H0CF, Index) is a subset of the ICE BofA US High Yield Index and includes securities that were rated investment grade at time of issuance.

Fallen Angel U.S. High Yield index data on and prior to February 28, 2020 reflects that of the ICE BofA US Fallen Angel High Yield Index (H0FA). From February 28, 2020 forward, the Fallen Angel U.S. High Yield index data reflects that of the Fund's underlying index, the ICE US Fallen Angel High Yield 10% Constrained Index (H0CF). Fallen Angel U.S. High Yield index data history which includes periods prior to February 28, 2020 links H0FA and H0CF and is not intended for third party use.

ICE Data Indices, LLC and its affiliates (“ICE Data”) indices and related information, the name "ICE Data", and related trademarks, are intellectual property licensed from ICE Data, and may not be copied, used, or distributed without ICE Data's prior written approval. The licensee's products have not been passed on as to their legality or suitability, and are not regulated, issued, endorsed, sold, guaranteed, or promoted by ICE Data. ICE Data MAKES NO WARRANTIES AND BEARS NO LIABILITY WITH RESPECT TO THE INDICES, ANY RELATED INFORMATION, ITS TRADEMARKS, OR THE PRODUCT(S) (INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, THEIR QUALITY, ACCURACY, SUITABILITY AND/OR COMPLETENESS).

All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. As with any investment strategy, there is no guarantee that investment objectives will be met and investors may lose money. Diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss in a declining market. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

© Van Eck Securities Corporation, Distributor, a wholly owned subsidiary of Van Eck Associates Corporation.

1 - 3 of 3